However, the explanation for these appeals can also be found economically, Bloomberg said Analytics He explained that if this measure is implemented, the company could incur losses in the range of $1,000 to $4,000 million depending on how many developers take advantage of the measure.
Initially, Apple described the adjudication of the case against Epic as a “resounding victory”, as the company was not found to be a monopoly, under California laws; However, he soon realized that it would affect one of his major businesses.
On the other hand, Epic also decided to appeal the case, because it failed to achieve its main objective in the case: to make Apple considered a monopoly. In addition, the case also imposed a fine of 30% on all revenue that the company collected through its external payment system while it was still working on Apple devices.
While Apple has made significant progress in this case, it’s important to note that the company will need to remain bound by its agreement with the Japan Fair Trade Commission, through which developers can connect their customers to their own payment sites. systems.
“Problem solver. Proud twitter specialist. Travel aficionado. Introvert. Coffee trailblazer. Professional zombie ninja. Extreme gamer.”
More Stories
With a surprise in the case: a strange cell phone from Nokia was introduced
PlayStation Stars: what it is, how it works and what it offers to its users | Sony | video games | tdex | revtli | the answers
t3n – Digital Pioneers | digital business magazine